Assistant vs Claw

Runnable illustrations of on-behalf-of Assistants vs fixed-identity Claws

View the Project on GitHub cobusgreyling/assistant-vs-claw

Essay Hook — "Whose Keys Are in the Lock?"

Use this outline for a Substack or Medium post that drives readers to the repo.

Working title

Whose Keys Are in the Lock? Why Assistant vs Claw Is the Agent Decision That Actually Matters

One-line thesis

Building agents is easy now; authorization is the bottleneck — and LangSmith Fleet's Assistant vs Claw split is the first design choice that determines whether you leak data or ship something useful.

Suggested structure

  1. The bottleneck moved — from "can the LLM call a tool?" to "whose identity calls it?"
  2. Two stories — Alice/Bob onboarding (Assistant) vs @product-bot in #general (Claw)
  3. The common mistake — Claw wired with personal OAuth (include avc-slack output)
  4. Beyond credentials — memory, inbox, audit (link to Fleet Engineering patterns)
  5. CTA — clone assistant-vs-claw, run avc-compare, read Fleet Engineering

Pull quotes

Same word — agent. Two completely different trust boundaries.

Not autonomy. Not model choice. Authorization.